The way that “female identity in advertising is almost exclusively defined in terms of female sexuality.” (Reichert and Lambiase 228) must be redefined. Just because “the male figure cannot bear the burden of sexual objectification” (Mulvey 7) does not give them the right to apply this burden onto their female counterparts. Fashion advertising must put an end to teaching women that they “are interesting because of their body parts. This fragmentation is problematic as it equates women with their distinctly female bodyparts” (Reichert and Lambiase 232). Along with this impact on women as individuals, collectively as a society it is harmful as it facilitates stereotypical power dynamics by subconsciously “communicating social norms that define what is acceptable or desirable” (Sacoto et al. 10). By examining both historical origins and modern examples, it becomes clear that fashion advertising does more than sell clothes, it “teaches us to consume, not the product, but its sign. What the product stands for is more important than what it is” (Reichert and Lambiase 228). Recognizing these patterns of representation in the fashion industry is an important step toward encouraging more balanced and respectful values among the patriarchally favoured society.

Images in this online publication are either in the public domain or are being used under fair dealing for the purpose of research and are provided solely for the purposes of research, private study, or education.